But Louis did not study the interests of others to harmonize French purposes with those of his neighbors the dictionary definition of diplomacy. To Louis XIV, however, diplomacy was a species of rarefied dust, mined only to be used in the eyes of his enemies. If one party shared similar stature or wealth, then the wherewithal of others would be diminished.
If one party had it all, then others would have none. Louis had always been a war-lover. As a child, he set up toy fortifications in his garden. Before adolescence, the king had learned to drill, master the manual of arms, and practice long hours with pike, musket, lance, and saber from horseback.
At the age of 13, Louis had already seen battles close-up enough to have tasted the tart of gunpowder. Ultimately, Louis only measured himself with the iron gauge of war. Colbert had spent huge sums on a competent Navy, overseas exploration, and the development of an autonomous marine branch of arms.
He visited no ship or shipyard until and that appears as an effort to mollify his aging minister. War was the primary means, Louis felt, to define his greatness. To Louis, a state without a competence at arms lacked gloire, and was incomplete and contemptible. Reform of the antiquated and ultimately ruinous tax system languished.
The war against the Grand Coalition would be determined, Louis lamented, by he who held the last gold coin, after the coin of all others had been depleted. For Louis, like Frederick the Great a century later, real power only could come from big battalions and big guns. For Louis, especially in his early years, the only legitimate object of peace could be the gift of time in which France would prepare for war.
The king yearned for what he was sure would be a lopsided romp through the Dutch countryside. It was too rich, too Protestant, and too independent. The question must have puzzled Louis.
If Louis had his way, the Dutch Republic, brought low and poor, would not ever even be in a position to abet another anti-French coalition. Holland had supported Spain, indirectly, after , and had signed a separate peace at Westphalia with Spain in , and then again made a separate arrangement with England in But the Dutch Republic presented much more of an affront to Louis than a threat.
But the winning argument for war was that though Holland appeared commercially strong, it was vulnerable, and hence the perfect target of opportunity.
He would lead the troops himself. In the end, the Dutch opened the dikes and flooded the countryside. French forces were obliged to retreat. By the second decade of the next century, it was William who proved more resourceful.
But Versailles—and its goingson—did did have functional purposes. He also destroyed aristocratic conspires, with speedy executions. Louis XIV curbed the power of the nobles in order to create a standing army and absorb more power for an absolutist regime, and instead created intendants, or nobles of the robe chosen from the upper middle class, to help manage the country.
The cruelty of the slave trade in the New World caused a growing unrest among the French people. This in combination with the absolutist rule beginning with Louis XIV in France angered many, resulted in revolts breaking.
Moctezuma II was placed in power as the ruler of the Aztecs when his uncle, Ahuitzotl, died in early While he had taken over the empire at its highest point, it had extended all the. To what extent do you consider this statement to be true? Ambition and glory are always pardonable in a Prince. War justified his regal authority and defined the relationship between the King and the nobility, so in his view unless he portrayed himself as a warrior King, he was not King at all.
Both the war of Devolution and the Dutch war were wars of gloire and little else; John Lynn argues that this view is supported by the fact that Louis was the instigator of both wars as he made the first aggressive moves. On both occasions, he led the army personally, in order to maximize the glory potential of each war, as if harking back to an Alexandrian time when rulers charged into the fray, leading from the front. Moreover, Louis brought members of the court, his wife and his children along on numerous campaigns, perhaps in an attempt to appear all the more.
Get Access. Louis XIV Domestic Policies Words 2 Pages successful governmental policy the optimization of domestic tranquility and foreign reputation. This article examines a particular event in the early years of the king's personal reign which clearly demonstrated to the young king the benefits and the necessity for such balance. The treaty of Montmartre properly belongs in the sphere of foreign affairs, a minor treaty in the long history of negotiations between France and the sovereign duchy of Lorraine.
Most users should sign in with their email address. If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above.
Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Search Menu. Article Navigation.
0コメント